Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation should be changed to avoid "pattern.en" as a module name #136

Open
glarchev opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@glarchev
Copy link

It looks like some of the examples in the documentation use "pattern.en" as a module name -- it appears that it should actually be "pattern.text.en" instead.

@verhoevenben
Copy link
Member

No, all language modules were designed by the developers to work as a module on their own (so pattern.en or pattern.it, …) for ease of use, I suppose.
For efficiency of the code, they gathered all language modules under the module ‘text’.

Op 30-nov.-2015, om 23:54 heeft glarchev notifications@github.com het volgende geschreven:

It looks like some of the examples in the documentation use "pattern.en" as a module name -- it appears that it should actually be "pattern.text.en" instead.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #136.

@glarchev
Copy link
Author

glarchev commented Dec 1, 2015

Since all the language modules are nested under "text", I think it's more confusing to refer to them as just "pattern.en". Although it appears to work, my IDE (PyDev) complains about unresolved import.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants