Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add =? #13

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add =? #13

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

amalloy
Copy link
Contributor

@amalloy amalloy commented Dec 12, 2012

I added a function named =? which mirrors the EquivPred stuff that Rich added to clojure the other day. I ran a benchmark on some simple tasks using =? compared to plain =, and it's around 25% faster for the particular use case I tried. Test code:

(let [objs [1 :x [2] "foo"]]
  (bench
   (doseq [x objs
           :let [cmp (=? x)]
           y objs]
     (cmp y))))

Evaluation count : 52415460 in 60 samples of 873591 calls.
Execution time mean : 1.148325 us
Execution time std-deviation : 23.104390 ns
Execution time lower quantile : 1.097617 us ( 2.5%)
Execution time upper quantile : 1.181024 us (97.5%)

Found 14 outliers in 60 samples (23.3333 %)
low-severe 3 (5.0000 %)
low-mild 9 (15.0000 %)
high-mild 2 (3.3333 %)
Variance from outliers : 9.3567 % Variance is slightly inflated by outliers

(let [objs [1 :x [2] "foo"]]
  (bench
   (doseq [x objs
           y objs]
     (= x y))))

Evaluation count : 40467780 in 60 samples of 674463 calls.
Execution time mean : 1.492065 us
Execution time std-deviation : 12.754895 ns
Execution time lower quantile : 1.476391 us ( 2.5%)
Execution time upper quantile : 1.523519 us (97.5%)

Found 2 outliers in 60 samples (3.3333 %)
low-severe 2 (3.3333 %)
Variance from outliers : 1.6389 % Variance is slightly inflated by outliers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant