Fix :include-macros error in cljc and cljs

[NoahTheDuke]

Please answer the following questions and leave the below in as part of your PR.

• I have read the developer documentation.

• This PR corresponds to an issue with a clear problem statement.

• This PR contains a test to prevent against future regressions

• I have updated the CHANGELOG.md file with a description of the addressed issue.

---

Closes #1830

Some jumbled thoughts:

Went to fix the above and realized that this should probably be expanded to a new linter so I wrote it. Makes me wonder if we're gonna need either a "all :require lints" linter with various options or if this step-by-step process is fine.

There's a couple levels of granularity to the config, which feels messy. :include-macros, :allow-clojure, :unknown-require-options, and which dialect is being checked all affect this, meaning we have 16 different combinations (some of which have the same outcome). Is there a way to lower this?

I noticed that for :refer-macros, we're not throwing any warnings if in a .clj file, so that's an area for improvement later down the line. Maybe this shouldn't be :include-macros specific but :dialect-require-options or something?

Excised the new linter, just throwing :syntax error if :include-macros's opt isn't literal true. Also checks for cljc and cljs now.

I changed the :unknown-require-option default to :off as all new linters should be off by default.

[borkdude]

You probably need to correct the capital letter in the tests

[NoahTheDuke]

Should be fixed now.

[borkdude]