update reference by Blench on Bantoid

[igoryanovich]

Hi everyone,

You probably want to supplement the reference Blench 2009 on Bantoid with Blench 2015 "The Bantoid languages", Oxford Handbooks Online, Linguistics, OUP, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.17.

The trees appear to be similar between the two texts, and generally 2015 is clearly a descendant of 2009, but the two contain a considerable amount of non-overlapping material.

[d97hah]

What is the non-overlapping material such that the 2015 supersedes the 2009? Pada tanggal Sen, 6 Agt 2018 pukul 02.03 igoryanovich < notifications@github.com> menulis:

…

Hi everyone, You probably want to supplement the reference Blench 2009 on Bantoid with Blench 2015 "The Bantoid languages", Oxford Handbooks Online, Linguistics, OUP, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.17. The trees appear to be similar between the two texts, and generally 2015 is clearly a descendant of 2009, but the two contain a considerable amount of non-overlapping material. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#241>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUDyNNskUaBiEOckevvRaOsu-xgZ6uuks5uN4e3gaJpZM4Vvl00> .

[igoryanovich]

For example, the 2009 (or rather the ms. that I happen to have, which is explicitly marked as not for citing) does not have a summary table on ATR harmony in Bantoid, etc. etc. More generally, the 2015 paper is a published work, unlike the 2009 one.

…

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:52 PM, d97hah ***@***.***> wrote: What is the non-overlapping material such that the 2015 supersedes the 2009? Pada tanggal Sen, 6 Agt 2018 pukul 02.03 igoryanovich < ***@***.***> menulis: > Hi everyone, > > You probably want to supplement the reference Blench 2009 on Bantoid with > Blench 2015 "The Bantoid languages", Oxford Handbooks Online, Linguistics, > OUP, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.17. > > The trees appear to be similar between the two texts, and generally 2015 > is clearly a descendant of 2009, but the two contain a considerable amount > of non-overlapping material. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#241>, or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ ADUDyNNskUaBiEOckevvRaOsu-xgZ6uuks5uN4e3gaJpZM4Vvl00> > . > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#241 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Aecy58lFHgdMFX1xTyCMe6mZsNyD50xHks5uOC3ugaJpZM4Vvl00> .

[d97hah]

But I mean for classification (as the refs are for there for classification). The 2015 may be published but does not have the richer information on justification for that clf that the 2009 has. Pada tanggal Sen, 6 Agt 2018 pukul 17.18 igoryanovich < notifications@github.com> menulis:

…

For example, the 2009 (or rather the ms. that I happen to have, which is explicitly marked as not for citing) does not have a summary table on ATR harmony in Bantoid, etc. etc. More generally, the 2015 paper is a published work, unlike the 2009 one. On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:52 PM, d97hah ***@***.***> wrote: > What is the non-overlapping material such that the 2015 supersedes the > 2009? > > Pada tanggal Sen, 6 Agt 2018 pukul 02.03 igoryanovich < > ***@***.***> menulis: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > You probably want to supplement the reference Blench 2009 on Bantoid with > > Blench 2015 "The Bantoid languages", Oxford Handbooks Online, > Linguistics, > > OUP, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.17. > > > > The trees appear to be similar between the two texts, and generally 2015 > > is clearly a descendant of 2009, but the two contain a considerable > amount > > of non-overlapping material. > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <#241>, or mute the thread > > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ > ADUDyNNskUaBiEOckevvRaOsu-xgZ6uuks5uN4e3gaJpZM4Vvl00> > > . > > > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#241 (comment)>, or mute > the thread > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Aecy58lFHgdMFX1xTyCMe6mZsNyD50xHks5uOC3ugaJpZM4Vvl00 > > . > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#241 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUDyLU8g3QHiTBUdVVbky_vya1EsFrNks5uOF4-gaJpZM4Vvl00> .

[igoryanovich]

I have not looked very carefully, but the general structure of the classification seems to be at least very similar. It just seems like a more stable, and also more authoritative, reference to use.

…

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:26 PM, d97hah ***@***.***> wrote: But I mean for classification (as the refs are for there for classification). The 2015 may be published but does not have the richer information on justification for that clf that the 2009 has. Pada tanggal Sen, 6 Agt 2018 pukul 17.18 igoryanovich < ***@***.***> menulis: > For example, the 2009 (or rather the ms. that I happen to have, which is > explicitly marked as not for citing) does not have a summary table on ATR > harmony in Bantoid, etc. etc. > > More generally, the 2015 paper is a published work, unlike the 2009 one. > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:52 PM, d97hah ***@***.***> wrote: > > > What is the non-overlapping material such that the 2015 supersedes the > > 2009? > > > > Pada tanggal Sen, 6 Agt 2018 pukul 02.03 igoryanovich < > > ***@***.***> menulis: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > You probably want to supplement the reference Blench 2009 on Bantoid > with > > > Blench 2015 "The Bantoid languages", Oxford Handbooks Online, > > Linguistics, > > > OUP, doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.17. > > > > > > The trees appear to be similar between the two texts, and generally > 2015 > > > is clearly a descendant of 2009, but the two contain a considerable > > amount > > > of non-overlapping material. > > > > > > — > > > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > > <#241>, or mute the thread > > > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ > > ADUDyNNskUaBiEOckevvRaOsu-xgZ6uuks5uN4e3gaJpZM4Vvl00> > > > . > > > > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <#241 (comment)>, > or mute > > the thread > > < > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ Aecy58lFHgdMFX1xTyCMe6mZsNyD50xHks5uOC3ugaJpZM4Vvl00 > > > > . > > > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#241 (comment)>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe- auth/ADUDyLU8g3QHiTBUdVVbky_vya1EsFrNks5uOF4-gaJpZM4Vvl00> > . > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#241 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Aecy5ybUaySHwnv_Jcm9MYY2WT60otANks5uOGAvgaJpZM4Vvl00> .