Support for geometric price books with r = 1.01

[onemonster]

Currently, the geometric price book does not support cases where the common ratio is bigger than 1.002. This is due to the unnecessary constraint that every possible value within uint16 be supported when creating price books.

In the case of arithmetic price books,

if (d == 0 || type(uint16).max * d > type(uint128).max - a) {
    revert Errors.CloberError(Errors.INVALID_COEFFICIENTS);
}

In the case of geometric price books.

if (_r16 * _a >= 1 << 192) {
    revert Errors.CloberError(Errors.INVALID_COEFFICIENTS);
}

Price books with 1.01 as the common ratio are needed for markets with lower liquidity. To support this, I propose we remove this constraint and allow price books that don't cover the full extent of the numbers possible within uint16.