Clojure implemented on the Erlang VM.
clojerl requires Erlang/OTP 18+ and rebar3.
git clone https://github.com/clojerl/clojerl cd clojerl make
make repl will start the REPL and show its prompt:
Clojure 0.0.0-974.592ad8a clje.user=>
From the REPL it's possible to start evaluating Clojure expressions:
clje.user=> (map inc (range 10)) (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10) clje.user=> (doc map) ------------------------- clojure.core/map ([f] [f coll] [f c1 c2] [f c1 c2 c3] [f c1 c2 c3 & colls]) Returns a lazy sequence consisting of the result of applying f to the set of first items of each coll, followed by applying f to the set of second items in each coll, until any one of the colls is exhausted. Any remaining items in other colls are ignored. Function f should accept number-of-colls arguments. Returns a transducer when no collection is provided. nil clje.user=> (doc inc) ------------------------- clojure.core/inc ([x]) Returns a number one greater than num. nil clje.user=>
For a very basic example of a project please check the example-web-app repository.
Erlang is a great language for building safe, reliable and scalable systems. It provides immutable, persistent data structures out of the box and its concurrency semantics are unequalled by any other language.
Clojure is a Lisp and as such comes with all the goodies Lisps provide. Apart from these Clojure also introduces powerful abstractions such as protocols, multimethods and seqs, to name a few.
Clojure was built to simplify the development of concurrent programs and some of its concurrency abstractions could be adapted to Erlang. It is fair to say that combining the power of the Erlang VM with the expressiveness of Clojure could provide an interesting, useful result to make the lives of many programmers simpler and make the world a happier place.
- Interoperability as smooth as possible, just like Clojure proper and ClojureScript do.
- Provide most Clojure abstractions.
- Provide all Erlang abstractions and toolset.
- Include a default OTP library in Clojerl.
Learn more about Erlang (and its VM), Clojure and language implementation.
This project is an experiment that I hope others will find useful. Regardless of whether it becomes a fully functional implementation of Clojure or not, I will have learned a lot along the way.
What is Clojerl?
Clojerl is an experimental implementation of Clojure on the Erlang VM. Its goal is to leverage the features and abstractions of Clojure that we love (macros, collections, seq, protocols, multimethods, metadata, etc.), with the robustness the Erlang VM provides for building (distributed) systems.
Have you heard about LFE and Joxa?
Yes. LFE and Joxa were each created with very specific and different goals in mind. LFE was born to provide a LISP syntax for Erlang. Joxa was mainly created as a platform for creating DSLs that could take advantage of the Erlang VM. Its syntax was inspired by Clojure but the creators weren't interested in implementing all of Clojure's features.
Aren't the language constructs for concurrency very different between Clojure and Erlang?
Yes, they are. On one hand Clojure provides tools to handle mutable state in a sane way, while making a clear distinction between identity and state through reference types. On the other, concurrency in the Erlang VM is implemented through processes and message passing. The idea in Clojerl is to encourage the Erlang/OTP concurrency model, but support as many Clojure constructs as possible and as far as they make sense in the Erlang VM.
here some of the reasons why he chose not to use the actor model in Clojure.But... but... Rich Hickey lists
That is not a question, but I see what you mean :). The points he makes are of course very good. For example, when no state is shared between processes there is some communication overhead, but this isolation is also an advantage under a lot of circumstances. He also mentions here that building for the distributed case (a.k.a processes and message passing) is more complex and not always necessary, so he decided to optimise for the non-distributed case and add distribution to the parts of the system that need it. Rich Hickey calls Erlang "quite impressive", so my interpretation of these writings is that they are more about exposing the rationale behind the decisions and the trade-offs he made when designing Clojure (on the JVM), than about disregarding the actor model.
Will Clojerl support every single Clojure feature?
No. Some of Clojure's features are implemented by relying on the underlying mutability of the JVM and its object system. The Erlang VM provides very few mutability constructs and no support for defining new types. This makes it very hard or nearly impossible to port some features into Clojerl's implementation.
Can I reuse existing Clojure(Script) libraries?
Yes, but they will need to be ported, just like for ClojureScript. In fact, most of Clojure's core namespaces were ported from the original .clj files in the Clojure JVM repository.
Any feedback, comment and/or suggestion is welcome!