Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: enable trigger throught FDW in the serverless architecture. #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2023

Conversation

lss602726449
Copy link
Contributor

In serverless architecture, implementing trigger the same as foreign table which use tuplestore to store the tuple is more efficient. Because it is inefficient to fetch tuple throught its ctid. Besides, in serverless architecture, concurrent update or delete is not supported. So we can fetch tuple directly without lock tuple in GetTupleForTrigger.

fix #ISSUE_Number


Change logs

Describe your change clearly, including what problem is being solved or what feature is being added.

If it has some breaking backward or forward compatibility, please clary.

Why are the changes needed?

Describe why the changes are necessary.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes.

How was this patch tested?

Please detail how the changes were tested, including manual tests and any relevant unit or integration tests.

Contributor's Checklist

Here are some reminders and checklists before/when submitting your pull request, please check them:

  • Make sure your Pull Request has a clear title and commit message. You can take git-commit template as a reference.
  • Sign the Contributor License Agreement as prompted for your first-time contribution(One-time setup).
  • Learn the coding contribution guide, including our code conventions, workflow and more.
  • List your communication in the GitHub Issues or Discussions (if has or needed).
  • Document changes.
  • Add tests for the change
  • Pass make installcheck
  • Pass make -C src/test installcheck-cbdb-parallel
  • Feel free to request cloudberrydb/dev team for review and approval when your PR is ready馃コ

In serverless architecture, implementing trigger the same as foreign table which
use tuplestore to store the tuple is more efficient. Because it is inefficient
to fetch tuple throught its ctid. Besides, in serverless architecture, concurrent
update or delete is not supported. So we can fetch tuple directly without lock
tuple in GetTupleForTrigger.
Copy link
Contributor

@my-ship-it my-ship-it left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@HuSen8891 HuSen8891 merged commit 61a6604 into cloudberrydb:union_store_catalog Nov 23, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants