Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new workflow for greetings #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2023
Merged

Add new workflow for greetings #7

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2023

Conversation

tuhaihe
Copy link
Member

@tuhaihe tuhaihe commented Jun 26, 2023

Create one new GitHub workflow named greetings.


Change logs

Add one new GitHub workflow for greeting new issue/PR makers. When they submit their first time issue/PR, the workflow runs the greeting.

Why are the changes needed?

For building our community.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

No changes on the Cloudberry Database core. No Test is needed.

Contributor's Checklist

Here are some reminders before you submit the pull request:

  • Document changes
  • Communicate in the GitHub Issues or Discussions (list them if needed)
  • Add tests for the change
  • Pass make installcheck
  • Pass make -C src/test installcheck-cbdb-parallel

@tuhaihe
Copy link
Member Author

tuhaihe commented Jun 26, 2023

We have run this workflow in cloudberrydb/cloudberrydb-site repo, see one example: cloudberrydb/cloudberrydb-site#8 (review)

@tuhaihe tuhaihe requested a review from my-ship-it June 26, 2023 04:06
Create one new GitHub workflow named greetings. When community users submit
their first time issue or PR, the workflow runs and comments with
customized greetings to encourage them.
@my-ship-it my-ship-it merged commit 5566500 into main Jun 26, 2023
1 check passed
@my-ship-it my-ship-it deleted the tuhaihe-patch-1 branch June 26, 2023 04:51
HuSen8891 added a commit to HuSen8891/cloudberrydb that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
For test case:

create table t0(c0 inet) distributed randomly;
create table t2(c0 inet) distributed randomly;
create table t3(c0 inet) distributed randomly;

SELECT ALL t2.c0, t3.c0, t0.c0 FROM t0, ONLY t3 FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON ((t2.c0)=(t3.c0))
WHERE (((('0.5496844753539182')||(t3.c0)))LIKE(CAST((0.13292931)::MONEY AS VARCHAR(971))))
UNION ALL SELECT t2.c0, t3.c0, t0.c0 FROM t0, ONLY t3 FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON ((t2.c0)=(t3.c0))
WHERE NOT ((((('0.5496844753539182')||(t3.c0)))LIKE((CAST(0.13292931 AS MONEY))::VARCHAR(971))))
UNION ALL SELECT ALL t2.c0, t3.c0, t0.c0 FROM t0*, ONLY t3 FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON ((t2.c0)=(t3.c0))
WHERE ((((('0.5496844753539182')||(t3.c0)))LIKE((CAST(0.13292931 AS MONEY))::VARCHAR(971)))) ISNULL;

will cause crash because of assert failure in 'create_plan_recurse'.

'cloudberrydb#3  0x00007fe94eccf476 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
 cloudberrydb#4  0x00007fe94ecb57f3 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79
 cloudberrydb#5  0x00007fe94fcdd548 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x7fe95043dcd0 "best_path->parallel_workers == best_path->locus.parallel_workers",
     errorType=0x7fe95043db06 "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x7fe95043dbdb "createplan.c", lineNumber=623) at assert.c:48
 cloudberrydb#6  0x00007fe94f94918f in create_plan_recurse (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0380, flags=1) at createplan.c:623
 cloudberrydb#7  0x00007fe94f94a1f8 in create_append_plan (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0700, flags=1) at createplan.c:1380
 cloudberrydb#8  0x00007fe94f948d37 in create_plan_recurse (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0700, flags=1) at createplan.c:481
 cloudberrydb#9  0x00007fe94f94e2d1 in create_motion_plan (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, path=0x55d7cbec0e50) at createplan.c:3316
 #10 0x00007fe94f9490dc in create_plan_recurse (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0e50, flags=1) at createplan.c:608
 cloudberrydb#11 0x00007fe94f948ba3 in create_plan (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0e50, curSlice=0x55d7cbe96f20) at createplan.c:392'

The parallel_workers should be set to zero because parallel full join is not supported yet.
my-ship-it pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2024
For test case:

create table t0(c0 inet) distributed randomly;
create table t2(c0 inet) distributed randomly;
create table t3(c0 inet) distributed randomly;

SELECT ALL t2.c0, t3.c0, t0.c0 FROM t0, ONLY t3 FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON ((t2.c0)=(t3.c0))
WHERE (((('0.5496844753539182')||(t3.c0)))LIKE(CAST((0.13292931)::MONEY AS VARCHAR(971))))
UNION ALL SELECT t2.c0, t3.c0, t0.c0 FROM t0, ONLY t3 FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON ((t2.c0)=(t3.c0))
WHERE NOT ((((('0.5496844753539182')||(t3.c0)))LIKE((CAST(0.13292931 AS MONEY))::VARCHAR(971))))
UNION ALL SELECT ALL t2.c0, t3.c0, t0.c0 FROM t0*, ONLY t3 FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON ((t2.c0)=(t3.c0))
WHERE ((((('0.5496844753539182')||(t3.c0)))LIKE((CAST(0.13292931 AS MONEY))::VARCHAR(971)))) ISNULL;

will cause crash because of assert failure in 'create_plan_recurse'.

'#3  0x00007fe94eccf476 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
 #4  0x00007fe94ecb57f3 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79
 #5  0x00007fe94fcdd548 in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=0x7fe95043dcd0 "best_path->parallel_workers == best_path->locus.parallel_workers",
     errorType=0x7fe95043db06 "FailedAssertion", fileName=0x7fe95043dbdb "createplan.c", lineNumber=623) at assert.c:48
 #6  0x00007fe94f94918f in create_plan_recurse (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0380, flags=1) at createplan.c:623
 #7  0x00007fe94f94a1f8 in create_append_plan (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0700, flags=1) at createplan.c:1380
 #8  0x00007fe94f948d37 in create_plan_recurse (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0700, flags=1) at createplan.c:481
 #9  0x00007fe94f94e2d1 in create_motion_plan (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, path=0x55d7cbec0e50) at createplan.c:3316
 #10 0x00007fe94f9490dc in create_plan_recurse (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0e50, flags=1) at createplan.c:608
 #11 0x00007fe94f948ba3 in create_plan (root=0x55d7cbe96f78, best_path=0x55d7cbec0e50, curSlice=0x55d7cbe96f20) at createplan.c:392'

The parallel_workers should be set to zero because parallel full join is not supported yet.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Published
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants