Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify namespace #41

Closed
sslavic opened this issue Jan 27, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Clarify namespace #41

sslavic opened this issue Jan 27, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@sslavic
Copy link
Contributor

sslavic commented Jan 27, 2018

  1. Does namespace identify event or event source (producer)?
  2. If latter, what is the value namespace adds on top of source-id?
  3. Is there a use case where events with same (event-type, event-type-version) can be published by more than one event source, so with difference in at least one of (source-id, source-type)?
  4. If namespace identifies event source and there's value added of namespace on top of source-id would it make sense to include namespace together with (source-id, source-type) as property of source object?
@deissnerk
Copy link
Contributor

In yesterday's call the need for specific examples was mentioned several times. Do we have an issue that captures this? Is it part of #37 ? I think it also affects #58 and probably many others.

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator

duglin commented Feb 2, 2018

if by example you mean "use cases driving our work", then yea I think #37 is part of it, but also the use-cases.md file that @ac360 recently added should cover it too - and PRs are welcome to add more. We should probably make sure we don't duplicate stuff between those two things (too much).

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator

duglin commented Mar 1, 2018

Can we pull this one into the overall "what is the source?" discussions? It seems related to me since they're all about identifying where the event came from so it makes sense to tackle them all at the same time.

@ultrasaurus
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is addressed by: #123

@sslavic sslavic closed this as completed Mar 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants