Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

introduce BTRFS #300

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

romain-dartigues
Copy link

This patch attempt to introduce BTRFS as a usable filesystem under Linux stemcells as briefly discussed in #299.

BTRFS benefited noticeable improvements since Linux 5.17, further reducing the performance gap it suffered.

While not recommended for all usages, it has some interesting features we would like to use for some edge cases, such as online compression.

We are looking for feedback on this pull request.

This patch attempt to introduce BTRFS as a usable filesystem under Linux.

BTRFS benefited noticeable improvements since Linux 5.17,
further reducing the performance gap it suffered.

While not recommended for all usages, it has some interesting features
we would like to use for some edge cases, such as online compression.
@rkoster
Copy link
Contributor

rkoster commented Jan 19, 2023

Draft PRs are ignored by the automation which syncs open PRs onto the github project board for Foundational Infrastructure Working group: https://github.com/orgs/cloudfoundry/projects/21/views/10

Please remove draft status so we can track this PR.

@rkoster rkoster requested review from a team, ystros and lnguyen and removed request for a team January 19, 2023 15:47
@romain-dartigues
Copy link
Author

Hi Ruben,
yes sorry for the pollution in the PR, I wanted to run some tests in our infrastructure before removing the Draft; please allow me a few more days.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants