New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability for bosh addons to exclude errand VMs #1613
Labels
Comments
i think you could do that via exclude jobs configuration.
…Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 9, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Slawek Ligus ***@***.***> wrote:
Per bosh runtime-config doc an include option exists. Word has it the latest bosh also supports exclude keyword. We'd like for the exclude keyword to allow for exclusion of errand VMs.
Problem: one of our bosh addons has a pretty expensive init step, i.e. it downloads a database locally. This is a pointless operation on an errand VM because the VM goes away. Additionally, that particular errand runs on a nano instance with only 512mb of RAM and causes the CF deployment to fail.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
@oozie does that work for you? |
Apologies for a delay in responding @cppforlife |
This has been implemented as of #1902. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Per bosh runtime-config doc an include option exists. Word has it the latest bosh also supports
exclude
keyword. We'd like for theexclude
keyword to allow for exclusion of errand VMs.Problem: one of our bosh addons has a pretty expensive init step, i.e. it downloads a database locally. This is a pointless operation on an errand VM because the VM goes away. Additionally, that particular errand runs on a nano instance with only 512mb of RAM and causes the CF deployment to fail.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: