Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider creating GH orgs for each working group #32

Closed
chipchilders opened this issue Oct 9, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Consider creating GH orgs for each working group #32

chipchilders opened this issue Oct 9, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
icebox issues that will be addressed at a future time

Comments

@chipchilders
Copy link
Contributor

Based on my comment in #31 :

We may struggle to keep this up to date... I know Chris Clark struggles to keep it up to date for the analytics dashboards. One option, which we don't need to solve for right now, might be to start moving repos into GitHub organizations dedicated to each working group. We could keep a shared GitHub org for the community repo, private repos (for CI config) and other shared code / resources.

@chipchilders chipchilders added the icebox issues that will be addressed at a future time label Oct 9, 2020
@julz
Copy link

julz commented Oct 9, 2020

Another option is to use a bot to manage the repos and permissions based on a yaml in a repo. Knative uses peribolos for this, for example, e.g. https://github.com/knative/community/blob/master/peribolos/knative.yaml.

@chipchilders
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another option is to use a bot to manage the repos and permissions based on a yaml in a repo. Knative uses peribolos for this, for example, e.g. https://github.com/knative/community/blob/master/peribolos/knative.yaml.

Good info. Thanks @julz !

@loewenstein
Copy link

I don't think spreading CF code over more orgs than already (I consider cloudfoundry-incubator a distraction when looking for repos) would be a good move. Automation sounds like the right thing to keep things in sync.

@emalm emalm closed this as completed Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
icebox issues that will be addressed at a future time
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants