Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resume same files after interruption #34

Closed
nlmarco opened this issue Jul 28, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Resume same files after interruption #34

nlmarco opened this issue Jul 28, 2014 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@nlmarco
Copy link
Contributor

nlmarco commented Jul 28, 2014

After an interruption, first finish those files that were already started, before. New files might have been added in the meantime, but no matter how the listing order changed, the new files should wait.

@nlmarco nlmarco added this to the 0.9.6 milestone Jul 28, 2014
Sebl29 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2014
FileWatcher and several callable tasks, which can abort or check for
file creation/modification/deletion.
Sebl29 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2014
an FileInProgressMark allows resuming to different remote repos (up and
download). IntegrationTest (SyncAbortIT) watches with FileWatcher and
interrupts, resumes.
Sebl29 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2014
Added functionality and test, to move a file that is in progress (so
moving also chunks, and don't delete the chunks in a clean up step).
nlmarco pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2014
Sebl29 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2014
Sebl29 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2014
Sebl29 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2014
nlmarco pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2014
Fixed wrong assumption in the test about the file order by adding a sort
operation. Files are now transferred in alphabetical order.
@nlmarco nlmarco closed this as completed Nov 29, 2014
@nlmarco nlmarco self-assigned this Aug 15, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant