Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding OpenStack native types #60

Closed
andybotting opened this issue Mar 11, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Adding OpenStack native types #60

andybotting opened this issue Mar 11, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@andybotting
Copy link
Contributor

We've just started using OpenStack's Heat API which supports CloudFormation templates and has compatibility for AWS CloudFormation types (e.g. AutoScalingGroups, ELB's, etc).

Over time, we've started switching to the native OpenStack equivalents and I've been adding them to my fork of troposphere. It's not complete, but I have all the basic types.

I haven't looked at tests or anything like that at this stage, but would you be interested in accepting them into troposphere master?

@markpeek
Copy link
Member

I would definitely like to see troposphere be a common library for both AWS CloudFormation and OpenStack Heat. I thought someone else had forked troposphere to work on a Heat implementation but I can't seem to find it in the various forks. Please submit pull requests with your work so we can have a unified tool and let me know if you have questions or need any assistance. For testing I run the code through pep8 and pyflakes in addition to the normal tests to ensure there aren't any regressions. Thanks!

@andybotting
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great :)

I'll get things into shape over the new few days and send you some pull requests and go from there.

cheers

@andybotting
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pull request #61 has been sent. Let me know what you think.

@markpeek
Copy link
Member

Merged. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants