You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is important for (at least) the following reasons:
There may be an attack vector relating to intentionally spiking the matching funds of a given round
If recipients have reason to expect a future round could have significantly higher matching funds, they may delay participation to conserve their social & marketing capital in case that happens. This would have the effect of diluting the quality of recipients in current rounds.
The existence of funding for future rounds will imbue users/participants/stakeholders with a level of incremental confidence in the system as a whole.
Potential implementations:
Matching funds are contributed to an "endowment" pool. Each round draws its matching funds from X% (e.g. half) of the existing funds in the endowment pool.
We set (gradually increasing?) per-round matching fund caps. All matching funds contributed beyond the cap of the upcoming round are automatically allocated to the following round, and so on.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Smooth out the matching fund amounts per round.
This is important for (at least) the following reasons:
Potential implementations:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: