Possible to mask channels in NLL evaluation #294
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
component pdf) which cause the corresponding channel to be skipped in
the NLL evaluation when the value is != 0.
it over to the CachingSimNLL in the createNLL step
the new method getChannelMask(bin). By default a RooRealVar named
mask_[CHANNEL]
will be created with a value of zero and setconstant.
latter is created in ShapeTools.py
--setPhysicsModelParameters mask_CHANNEL1=1,mask_CHANNEL2=1,...
Only done basic testing of this so far with single fits in MultDimFit, but seems to work as intended: masking all but one channel gives identical results to just fitting a datacard with only that channel. But should check a wider range of cases to make sure there's no odd behaviour.