New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
msafety set to 1e-4 #26
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smrenna (Stephen Mrenna) for branch cms/230. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test for CMSSW_10_2_X |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
@smrenna Should this also be included in other branches? e.g. |
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
Hi @qliphy . My main motivation was to not move too far away from the P8 default. As this is needed for SUSY and they can live with 10_2 and 9_4 I would prefer just updating P8.230. What do you think? |
Yes, should be identical to #20 but with lower values. |
assign generators |
New categories assigned: generators @alberto-sanchez,@SiewYan,@GurpreetSinghChahal,@mkirsano,@agrohsje you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+1 |
so this goes in 10_2 ? |
10_2 and 9_4. |
cmsdist PRs cms-sw/cmsdist#6469 and cms-sw/cmsdist#6470 |
Request from Sam Bein for lower threshold on MSAFETY in ResonanceDecays (only) to allow for pMSSM decays with really small mass splittings.