Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add isolated gen-level photons to the nanoaod #449

Merged

Conversation

AndrewLevin
Copy link

PR description:

I have added a collection of isolated gen photons to the Rivet particle level producer in CMSSW (cms-sw#28371), and I want to also add it to the NANOAODSIM. This is useful for reporting cross sections with photons in the final state.

PR validation:

I have run over a recent ttbar relval sample and found that this pull request increases the size of the nanoaod by around 0.025%.

@gpetruc-bot
Copy link

Copy link

@gpetruc-bot gpetruc-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automatic test report for 1332995

Code integration

Code checks passed for this PR

Code format passed for this PR

Tests

  • Long test data102X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test data106Xul17 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test data106Xul18 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test data80X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test data94X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test data94X2016 (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test data94Xv2 (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc102X (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc106Xul16 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc106Xul17 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc106Xul18 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc80X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc94X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc94X2016 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc94Xv2 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Test mc_94Xv2: passed
  • Test mc_102X: passed
  • Test data_94X: passed
  • Test data_102X: passed

Disk size report

Sample kb/event ref kb/event diff
TTbar MC 102X 1.925 1.923 0.001 ( +0.1% )
TTbar MC 94Xv1 1.989 1.988 0.001 ( +0.1% )
TTbar MC 94Xv2 2.026 2.023 0.002 ( +0.1% )
TTbar MC 94X2016 1.810 1.810 0.000 ( +0.0% )
TTbar MC 80X 1.941 1.939 0.002 ( +0.1% )
Data 102X 1.011 1.011 0.000 ( +0.0% )
Data 94Xv1 0.971 0.971 0.000 ( +0.0% )
Data 80X 0.813 0.814 -0.000 ( -0.0% )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants