Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RecHit printouts (IMPOSSIBLE, perfect match not found) #71

Open
makortel opened this issue Jun 1, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

RecHit printouts (IMPOSSIBLE, perfect match not found) #71

makortel opened this issue Jun 1, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@makortel
Copy link

makortel commented Jun 1, 2018

I noticed from the log of "ttbar testing 10824.8" with TTbar+PU for #62 as the input the following printouts from the rechits

Begin processing the 28th record. Run 1, Event 31, LumiSection 1 on stream 0 at 31-May-2018 18:11:13.575 CEST
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:11:14 CEST Run: 1 Event: 31
perfect Match not found 1435/9851/0/9861 2583715!=2856745 0/0/0
%MSG
...
Begin processing the 66th record. Run 1, Event 115, LumiSection 3 on stream 0 at 31-May-2018 18:11:44.050 CEST
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:11:44 CEST Run: 1 Event: 115
IMPOSSIBLE 1334/12427/0/12428 2332265/2407919 6!=1
%MSG
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:11:44 CEST Run: 1 Event: 115
perfect Match not found 1334/12427/0/12428 2332265!=2407919 6/1/1
%MSG
...
Begin processing the 94th record. Run 1, Event 146, LumiSection 3 on stream 0 at 31-May-2018 18:12:06.270 CEST
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:12:06 CEST Run: 1 Event: 146
IMPOSSIBLE 1241/7716/9/7729 9098/3756146 83!=2
%MSG
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:12:06 CEST Run: 1 Event: 146
perfect Match not found 1241/7716/9/7729 9098!=3756146 83/2/2
%MSG
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:12:06 CEST Run: 1 Event: 146
IMPOSSIBLE 1241/7716/10/7741 8490/9098 86!=32769
%MSG
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:12:06 CEST Run: 1 Event: 146
IMPOSSIBLE 1241/7716/11/7740 2763678/8490 91!=31
%MSG
%MSG-w GPUHits2CPU:  SiPixelRecHitHeterogeneous:siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting  31-May-2018 18:12:06 CEST Run: 1 Event: 146
perfect Match not found 1241/7716/11/7740 2763678!=8490 91/31/31
%MSG

Link to full log
https://fwyzard.web.cern.ch/fwyzard/patatrack/pulls/f24fdf85aaaf7542195d985cacab4640b4ae5efb/RelValTTbar_13-CMSSW_10_2_0_pre3-PU25ns_101X_upgrade2018_realistic_v7-v1/testing-10824.8-step3.log

(the "development" log, i.e. without #62, shows the same printouts)

@VinInn Are the IMPOSSIBLE ones something that should be investigated at some point?

@cmsbot
Copy link

cmsbot commented Jun 1, 2018

A new Issue was created by @makortel Matti Kortelainen.

can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@VinInn
Copy link

VinInn commented Jun 1, 2018

yes, this is due to the difference between cpu and gpu clustering: on cpu the size of a cluster is limited
while on gpu is not
I investigated the origin and is understood

@makortel
Copy link
Author

makortel commented Jun 1, 2018

We discussed with @VinInn, and these are something to be checked after we have the full workflow (on GPU) working.

@fwyzard
Copy link

fwyzard commented Jun 4, 2018

since it looks like the GPU algorithm behaves "better" than the CPU one, would it make sense to "improve" the latter in the same way ?

@VinInn
Copy link

VinInn commented Jun 4, 2018

It will require a full involvement of Pixel DPG.
I suggested to "go public" with them once Run2 is finished and we hope they will have more time to dedicate to software for Run3.
(we can of course do it for the limited case of Phase1 pixel in run3 as a specific Raw2Cluster in a similar way I did it for Strip)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants