Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update RecoLocalCalo-EcalDeadChannelRecoveryAlgos to V01-00-01 #5037

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 2, 2019

Conversation

mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

New files added minor version +1 to 01

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/gcc700.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 12, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) cms-data/RecoLocalCalo-EcalDeadChannelRecoveryAlgos#1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/908/console Started: 2019/06/12 15:12

@mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor Author

abort
tag does not exist yet

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Jenkins tests are aborted.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #5037 was updated.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 12, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) cms-sw/cmssw#27175,cms-data/RecoLocalCalo-EcalDeadChannelRecoveryAlgos#1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/918/console Started: 2019/06/12 17:43

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 319f715

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-231878/918/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals AddOn

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
135.4 step1

runTheMatrix-results/135.4_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS/step1_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS.log

5.1 step1
runTheMatrix-results/5.1_TTbar+TTbarFS+HARVESTFS/step1_TTbar+TTbarFS+HARVESTFS.log

  • AddOn:

I found errors in the following addon tests:

cmsDriver.py TTbar_8TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run1_mc --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,L1Reco,RECO,EI,VALIDATION --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot Realistic8TeVCollision : FAILED - time: date Wed Jun 12 19:11:24 2019-date Wed Jun 12 19:07:46 2019 s - exit: 17920
cmsDriver.py TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run2_mc_l1stage1 --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,L1Reco,RECO,EI,VALIDATION --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot NominalCollision2015 --era Run2_25ns : FAILED - time: date Wed Jun 12 19:13:01 2019-date Wed Jun 12 19:08:03 2019 s - exit: 17920
cmsDriver.py TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_cfi --conditions auto:run2_mc --fast -n 100 --eventcontent AODSIM,DQM --relval 100000,1000 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,L1Reco,RECO,EI,VALIDATION --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.L1THLT --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RECO,DQMIO --beamspot NominalCollision2015 --era Run2_2016 : FAILED - time: date Wed Jun 12 19:13:09 2019-date Wed Jun 12 19:08:11 2019 s - exit: 17920

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-231878/945/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 629 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3254096
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3253756
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.02 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 136.731 ): 0.020 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 28, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) cms-sw/cmssw#27175,cms-data/RecoLocalCalo-EcalDeadChannelRecoveryAlgos#1
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/1241/console Started: 2019/06/28 11:37

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-231878/1241/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 54 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 33
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3255670
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3255331
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 32 files compared)
  • Checked 137 log files, 14 edm output root files, 33 DQM output files

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals
This Pr just move the data package in default section so that it can be tested automatically with new PR tests system

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 2, 2019

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/gcc700 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the new-branch-for-data-tag branch July 4, 2019 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants