[OpenLoops-2.1.0]Topping up Vtt+jets and Htt+jets libraries processes #5327
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @SiewYan (SiewYan) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
please test for slc7_aarch64_gcc820 @SiewYan , is it possible to build multiple small shared libs for openloops? |
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
@smuzaffar , yes, the LHC.coll is a pre-defined collection of small shared libs, and it should work, if not, I will have to pre-define a txt file with .coll extension specifying each process's library names. |
|
Comparison job queued. |
|
please test workflow 534.0,536.0 |
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
-1 Tested at: cac8509 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testPYDablooms had ERRORS |
|
Comparison job queued. |
|
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
|
please test workflow 534.0,536.0 |
cmsbuild
added
comparison-pending
tests-pending
and removed
comparison-available
tests-rejected
labels
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
|
Comparison job queued. |
|
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
|
+externals |
cmsbuild
added
externals-approved
fully-signed
and removed
externals-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_0_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
|
Hello @smuzaffar , I have a followup question on the Openloops's libraries processes. There is a growing interest in using other libraries processes, one way is to manually include all the libraries processes by defining a txt file and take in as an argument during compilation https://github.com/SiewYan/cmsdist/blob/cac85098983d7c2f0ff15444d71054f60c534deb/openloops.spec#L26 |
|
@SiewYan do you want to provide the txt as an external input? I can imagine it could be hardcoded into the spec file itself. One question I have is: how big would the proclib repository become? It is already larger than 3 GB |
lhc.coll does not contain all P-P collision processes. Topping up Vtt+Jets and Htt+jets loop processes.