New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update tensorflow to 2.6.3 #7862
Conversation
please test |
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_4_X/master. @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test for el8_aarch64_gcc10 |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3f06c/24672/summary.html External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
please test |
Pull request #7862 was updated. |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3f06c/24675/summary.html External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3f06c/24673/summary.html External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
please test |
Pull request #7862 was updated. |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test SiStripDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
enable profiling |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3f06c/24735/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a3f06c/24751/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 , can you please check the DQM comparison results here? There are some differences in |
Looks like TF ran with the same CPU options so it's not the usual topic related to different CPUs giving different results
@leonardogiannini @cms-sw/tracking-pog-l2 could these changes in Tracking/TrackBuilding/pixelLessStep_quickAssociatorByHits be from the DNN in MkFit having small differences with a newer TF? |
I'm noticing a similar DQM change in cms-sw/cmssw#37918, which seems not related to this TF upgrade at all. So maybe there is some instability in the tracking DQM now. I will open an issue in cmssw. |
@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 , as DQM comparison differences are not related to this update, should be go ahead and merge this? There are a lot of security alerts (flaged by guithub bot: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmsdist/security/dependabot ) which are due to TF 2.6.0. Updatign to |
assign reconstruction |
+reconstruction
|
New categories assigned: reconstruction @jpata,@slava77,@clacaputo you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_5_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
No description provided.