Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rivet: use eigen flags; update rivet analysis path for multi-arch #9141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

Rivet tests are failing in multi-arch build. Looks like rivet internally has a copyif eigen but in RivetEigen namespace. Just to make sure that we use consistent egien flags I have updated river spec to use CMS_EIGEN_CXX_FLAGS build flags.

Rivet tool sets RIVET_ANALYSIS_PATH pointing to rivet/lib/Rivet. This causes runtime errors for multu-arch builds. Looks like rivet already knows this path. so no need to set it for rivet itself

[a]

python3: ../../include/Rivet/Math/eigen3/src/Core/DenseStorage.h:128: RivetEigen::internal::plain_array<T, Size, MatrixOrArrayOptions, 32>::plain_array() [with T = double; int Size = 4; int MatrixOrArrayOptions = 0]: Assertion `(internal::UIntPtr(eigen_unaligned_array_assert_workaround_gcc47(array)) & (31)) == 0 && "this assertion is explained here: " "http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/dox-devel/group__TopicUnalignedArrayAssert.html" " **** READ THIS WEB PAGE !!! ****"' failed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for branch IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @iarspider, @aandvalenzuela can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 17, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

test parameters:

  • addpkg = GeneratorInterface/RivetInterface

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test for CMSSW_14_1_MULTIARCHS_X

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d4bab/38887/summary.html
COMMIT: 0c40a60
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-04-16-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/9141/38887/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d4bab/38887/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d4bab/38887/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

+externals

unit tests for MULTIARCHS IB passed

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit dcee9d7 into IB/CMSSW_14_1_X/master Apr 17, 2024
13 of 16 checks passed
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d4bab/38889/summary.html
COMMIT: 0c40a60
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_MULTIARCHS_X_2024-04-16-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/9141/38889/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d4bab/38889/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5d4bab/38889/git-merge-result

Unit Tests

I found 1 errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestPhysicsToolsPatAlgos had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 206 lines from the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 70282 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3319227
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 305239
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 268
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3013700
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 13.160999999999998 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): -0.586 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): 1.229 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 13034.0 ): -2.906 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 13234.0,... ): 0.738 KiB Physics/NanoAODDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.043,... ): -0.016 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 140.063 ): -0.070 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 141.044 ): 0.086 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 141.046 ): 0.016 KiB JetMET/SUSYDQM
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): -0.836 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 25202.0 ): 0.469 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 7.3 ): ...
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 18 / 46 workflows

This was referenced Apr 17, 2024
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the rivet-multi-arch branch April 22, 2024 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants