Small fix in HLT b-tag validation code (75X)

[silviodonato]

This PR fixes:

• setEfficiencyFlag() option for mistag vs efficiency plots
• trigger name HLT_PFMET120_NoiseCleaned_BTagCSV07_v -> HLT_PFMET120_NoiseCleaned_BTagCSV0p72_v
• trigger name HLT_CaloMHTNoPU90_PFMET90_PFMHT90_IDLoose_ -> HLT_CaloMHTNoPU90_PFMET90_PFMHT90_IDTight_

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @silviodonato for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Small fix in HLT b-tag validation code (75X)

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Btag

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ferencek, @acaudron, @pvmulder, @imarches this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10052/10963/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
25202.0 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

does this need to be deleted?

[davidlange6]

+1