75X ExoLL and FSPremix dictionary

[srimanob]

(1) Add ExoLL relval
(2) Fix FSPremix Dictionary

[srimanob]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

75X ExoLL and FSPremix dictionary

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@cmsbuild, @srimanob, @boudoul, @franzoni can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 33c3b5d
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10154/189019/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1

[davidlange6]

looks like this is causing problems.. maybe because of the forward port from 75x? I will revert.

[franzoni]

Hello David @davidlange6 ,
can you please indicate to us what the problem is ?
Nothing obvious looking at https://cms-sw.github.io/relvalLogDetail.html#slc6_amd64_gcc491;CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-07-19-1100
where I see this PR was already merged.
Thanks,
G.

[davidlange6]

i think if you run runTheMatrix.py you’ll see the problem

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10232/11319/runTheMatrix-results/matrixTests.log

the same change to add this susy workflow was made in a different place (and different commit/PR) for 75x

On Jul 20, 2015, at 3:08 PM, Giovanni Franzoni notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello David @davidlange6 ,
can you please indicate to us what the problem is ?
Nothing obvious looking at https://cms-sw.github.io/relvalLogDetail.html#slc6_amd64_gcc491;CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-07-19-1100
where I see this PR was already merged.
Thanks,
G.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[davidlange6]

but to clarify - the problem is in 76x, not 75x. - so my revert is not perfect as it removes the change from both 75x and 76x.

On Jul 20, 2015, at 3:13 PM, David Lange David.Lange@cern.ch wrote:

i think if you run runTheMatrix.py you’ll see the problem

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10232/11319/runTheMatrix-results/matrixTests.log

the same change to add this susy workflow was made in a different place (and different commit/PR) for 75x

On Jul 20, 2015, at 3:08 PM, Giovanni Franzoni notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello David @davidlange6 ,
can you please indicate to us what the problem is ?
Nothing obvious looking at https://cms-sw.github.io/relvalLogDetail.html#slc6_amd64_gcc491;CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-07-19-1100
where I see this PR was already merged.
Thanks,
G.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[srimanob]

What should I do with this one? Make it from clean scratch of IB that will come out with #10279?

[davidlange6]

Yes. And cherry-pick your 76x version to avoid conflicts.

On Jul 20, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Phat Srimanobhas <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

What should I do with this one? Make it from clean scratch of IB that will come out with #10279#10279?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/10154#issuecomment-122881802.