Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

don't pass puppi NaNs to pseudojet methods (port of #11267 to 75X) #11269

Conversation

slava77
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 slava77 commented Sep 16, 2015

fixes an assert condition from bad inputs

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Sep 16, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_5_X milestone Sep 16, 2015
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @slava77 (Slava Krutelyov) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

don't pass puppi NaNs to pseudojet methods (port of #11267 to 75X)

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/PileupAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @vadler, @monttj, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ahinzmann, @jdolen, @rappoccio this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2015
…gn591/crashA-PuppiContainer

don't pass puppi NaNs to pseudojet methods (port of #11267 to 75X)
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 32be316 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_5_X Sep 17, 2015
@slava77
Copy link
Contributor Author

slava77 commented Sep 17, 2015

+1

(just for the record: there are no changes in jenkins as expected)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants