Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use QIEType instead of old transient qieIndex #13004

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 27, 2016

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

Following up on #12905, the QIE shape (ADC ladder) should be determined by the new QIEType database parameter.

Attn: @walterjr, @abdoulline

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

CalibCalorimetry/HcalAlgos
CalibFormats/HcalObjects
CondFormats/HcalObjects

@diguida, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @ggovi, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apfeiffer1, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

Following commands in first line of a comment are recognized

  • +1|approve[d]|sign[ed]: L1/L2's to approve it
  • -1|reject[ed]: L1/L2's to reject it
  • assign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to request signatures from other categories
  • unassign <category>[,<category>[,...]]: L1/L2's to remove signatures from other categories
  • hold: L1/all L2's/release manager to mark it as on hold
  • unhold: L1/user who put this PR on hold
  • merge: L1/release managers to merge this request
  • [@cmsbuild,] please test: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests
  • [@cmsbuild,] please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#<PR>: L1/L2 and selected users to start jenkins tests using externals from cmsdist

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor

lgray commented Jan 20, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

The comparison looks good to me. No changes expected or observed. @mmusich, @diguida, @ggovi can you take a look?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jan 22, 2016

+1

  • code changes in line with description
  • no differences observed in the comparison with baseline

@abdoulline
Copy link

@ggovi
Giacomo, may I draw your attention to this PR (approval)?

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Jan 26, 2016

@abdoulline
Not sure about the aim to remove the data member mQIEIndex. However, it is was a transient one, so it should work.Did you explicitly try to read existing data with this class?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ggovi - several of the matrix tests use existing data, and none of the comparisons show any problems.

@ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

ggovi commented Jan 26, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2016
use QIEType instead of old transient qieIndex
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 8553987 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Jan 27, 2016
cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2016
@kpedro88 kpedro88 mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants