Update to tau iso by pt in the hlt config

[perrotta]

HLT configuration changes that take into account the modifications of the L2TauPixelIsoTagProducer, already merged in 80X with #13176

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Configuration
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers
RecoHI/HiTracking
RecoLocalTracker/SiStripClusterizer
RecoTauTag/HLTProducers
RecoTracker/ConversionSeedGenerators
RecoTracker/MeasurementDet
RecoTracker/TkTrackingRegions
TrackingTools/GsfTracking
TrackingTools/KalmanUpdators
TrackingTools/TrajectoryFiltering

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @forthommel, @abbiendi, @mandrenguyen, @nickmccoll, @lgray, @threus, @geoff-smith, @battibass, @makortel, @jhgoh, @dgulhan, @jlagram, @OlivierBondu, @yduhm, @yetkinyilmaz, @Sam-Harper, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @bellan, @jalimena, @cerati, @mschrode, @richard-cms, @echapon, @trocino, @gbenelli, @jazzitup, @yenjie, @Martin-Grunewald, @kurtejung, @gpetruc, @istaslis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[perrotta]

Uhm... Extra signatures sneaked in because I attached two already merged pull requests (for testing purposes). I will rebase to get rid of them: only HLT must remain

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #13190 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fwyzard can you please check and sign again.

[perrotta]

Rebased to CMSSW_8_0_X_2016-02-04-1100
Only HLT signature is needed now

[perrotta]

+1
(Here it is)

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/10998/console

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[perrotta]

@davidlange6
please consider this for pre6

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: 8e0384c
I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testRecoMETMETProducers had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13190/10998/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
77cf558
ce79f96
ec1fee3
49024f5
2365b6e
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13190/10998/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13190/10998/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13190/10998/summary.html

[Martin-Grunewald]

error unrelated to this PR

[Martin-Grunewald]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11012/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 8e0384c
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13190/11012/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13190/11012/summary.html

[davidlange6]

+1