bsunanda:Phase2-gem11 More realistic ME0 geometry and extended GE21 geometry

[bsunanda]

GE21 geometry is currently used to study 4-layer vs 2-layer option

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12060/console

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/MuonCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 01aa341
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13834/12060/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13834/12060/summary.html

[bsunanda]

@ianna @civanch Could you sign this PR?

[bsunanda]

@ianna @civanch We would like this to be integrated soon because the ME0 part should go in as the default

[civanch]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

@bsunanda - are all 8 versions really still under consideration?

[bsunanda]

I believe not. I shall clarify from GEM DPG and get rid of the versions which are no longer necessary.

---

From: David Lange [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 30 March 2016 18:24
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] bsunanda:Phase2-gem11 More realistic ME0 geometry and extended GE21 geometry (#13834)

@bsunandahttps://github.com/bsunanda - are all 8 versions really still under consideration?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/13834#issuecomment-203512297

[calabria]

@davidlange6 no absolutely not, they are different version we created in time with continuos improvements... if you are worried about the proliferation of possible geometries for the 2023 scenario, we want to use just one option, the other ones are there for special studies, other ones are quite old. If instead you want simply to make some cleaning we can check and remove old geometries/files/folders.

[davidlange6]

I don’t need one - but 8 is getting more than excessive:) if new versions mean old versions are obsolete, please remove, or better yet, overwrite the old versions. Git in any case tracks the full history

On Mar 30, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Cesare notifications@github.com wrote:

@davidlange6 no absolutely not, they are different version we created in time with continuos improvements... if you are worried about the proliferation of possible geometries for the 2023 scenario, we want to use just one option, the other ones are there for special studies, other ones are quite old. If instead you want simply to make some cleaning we can check and remove old geometries/files/folders.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[bsunanda]

@davidlange66 We are working on this. We shall reduce the number of versions in near future. But could you integrate this PR and we would make a proposal for retaining only the ones we use at the moment

---

From: David Lange [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 30 March 2016 18:50
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] bsunanda:Phase2-gem11 More realistic ME0 geometry and extended GE21 geometry (#13834)

I don’t need one - but 8 is getting more than excessive:) if new versions mean old versions are obsolete, please remove, or better yet, overwrite the old versions. Git in any case tracks the full history

On Mar 30, 2016, at 6:43 PM, Cesare notifications@github.com wrote:

@davidlange6 no absolutely not, they are different version we created in time with continuos improvements... if you are worried about the proliferation of possible geometries for the 2023 scenario, we want to use just one option, the other ones are there for special studies, other ones are quite old. If instead you want simply to make some cleaning we can check and remove old geometries/files/folders.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/13834#issuecomment-203522629

[davidlange6]

+1