Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HLT update to L1T menu v5 incl. GT (80X) #14106

Merged
merged 19 commits into from Apr 20, 2016

Conversation

Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@Martin-Grunewald Martin-Grunewald commented Apr 16, 2016

HLT update to L1T menu v5 incl. GT (80X)
This PR includes the GT changes from #13893 plus the changes as in #14077
It also includes the previous HLT PR #13862 as that is not yet integrated, thus requiring again all signatures.
Rebased to CMSSW_8_0_X at 14:10 April 16th, as #13862 and #13893 are now integrated, so some fewer signatures!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Martin-Grunewald (Martin Grunewald) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa
Configuration/HLT
Configuration/Skimming
HLTrigger/Configuration
HLTrigger/HLTcore
HLTrigger/HLTfilters
L1Trigger/L1TGlobal
Utilities/ReleaseScripts

@perrotta, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @franzoni, @cerminar, @fabozzi, @Martin-Grunewald, @rekovic, @srimanob, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @mmusich, @hengne, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @wddgit, @jalimena, @geoff-smith, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12425/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

fwyzard commented Apr 16, 2016

@Martin-Grunewald if you rebase the branch on top of the latest CMSSW_8_0_X, it should clean up some history and get rid of the core, pdmv and l1 signatures.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

You really seem to think this is funny. What the hell!

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

I think it's funny? I'm instead annoyed at the way people have strongly coupled unrelated stuff...

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #14106 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @cerminar, @Martin-Grunewald, @franzoni, @fwyzard, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12511/console

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

i guess its the different commits with the same change that is creating the mess. For next time, git cherry-pick is your friend.

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit f520689 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Apr 20, 2016
@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, thanks for integrating!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Apr 20, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14106/12507/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
140.53 step 2
134.911 step 3
1001.0 step 2
1000.0 step 2
1003.0 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14106/12511/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
140.53 step 2
134.911 step 3
1001.0 step 2
1000.0 step 2
1003.0 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14106/12511/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
140.53 step 2
134.911 step 3
1001.0 step 2
1000.0 step 2
1003.0 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

@Martin-Grunewald Martin-Grunewald deleted the HLTinApril80X branch April 26, 2016 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants