New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
relval matrix update #14469
relval matrix update #14469
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @hengne (Hengne Li) for CMSSW_8_1_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @davidlange6, @hengne, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are list here #13028 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
For completeness, should the MiniAOD DQM and validation sequences and MiniAOD output file be added too to 2017 workflows now? |
@makortel thanks, definitely, sorry that i should actually think of this point in advance... will update this PR after some local test. |
hold |
Pull request has been put on hold by @hengne |
unhold |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@makortel done. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar |
@davidlange6 I think it would be good to have this PR merged for building the 810pre5. for this i sent you and @slava77 an email a couple of days ago with name "Re: 2017 PR tests?", but maybe that didn't catch your attention. What can be an alternative for this? It would be good to have the EI and PAT steps in 2017 workflows and they are tested to be working fine. |
+1 for the record this also turns on HLT , PAT, EI for the phase 2 workflows. Seems ok at this point, but may eventually cause problems. |
@davidlange6 Thanks! so far local tests are all ok (in sense of running without crash), i have submitted the relval 2017 workflows with these changes with pre5, will see the results soon with higher statistics. |
@hengne |
@slava77 I have tested wf 11024, it works fine. Together with 11024, all the 2023 scenarios which are using the updated "DigiFull" step (HLT:@Fake added) have been tested. The results summarized below: 10424: '2023' 10624: '2023tilted' 11024: '2023LReco' 11224: '2023Reco' |
Updates include: