bsunanda:Run2-alca44 Recover from 0 event selection in IsoTrack Trigger

[bsunanda]

Backporting PR 14514 and needed to go for HLT

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12998/console
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13001/console

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalIsolatedTrackReco
HLTrigger/special

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @ghellwig, @cerminar, @Martin-Grunewald, @franzoni, @fwyzard, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @ghellwig, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[fwyzard]

Dear Sunanda, before approving this change to the HLT, I would like to see a short description of the change, and the usual HLT rate and running studies. Looking at some of the changes in confused. Did this ever run with the Stage 2 L1 trigger ? Ciao, .Andrea

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 1de2818
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14516/13001/summary.html

[bsunanda]

Hi Andrea

I am doing this with Sourav Dey who ran it on the recent data. I shall ask him to prepare a few slides with the changes made and corresponding rates + timing information. Regards

Sunanda

---

From: Andrea Bocci [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 16 May 2016 19:48
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee; Mention
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-alca44 Recover from 0 event selection in IsoTrack Trigger (#14516)

Dear Sunanda,

before approving this change to the HLT, I would like to see a short
description of the change, and the usual HLT rate and running studies.

Looking at some of the changes in confused. Did this ever run with the
Stage 2 L1 trigger ?

Ciao,
.Andrea

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/14516#issuecomment-219494215

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14516/13001/summary.html

[bsunanda]

Hi Andrea,
Here I have attached the same slides with three different formats.

Regards,
Sourav

---

From: Sunanda Banerjee
Sent: 16 May 2016 23:21
To: cms-sw/cmssw; cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Mention; Sourav Dey
Subject: RE: [cms-sw/cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-alca44 Recover from 0 event selection in IsoTrack Trigger (#14516)

Hi Andrea

I am doing this with Sourav Dey who ran it on the recent data. I shall ask him to prepare a few slides with the changes made and corresponding rates + timing information. Regards

Sunanda

---

From: Andrea Bocci [notifications@github.com]
Sent: 16 May 2016 19:48
To: cms-sw/cmssw
Cc: Sunanda Banerjee; Mention
Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] bsunanda:Run2-alca44 Recover from 0 event selection in IsoTrack Trigger (#14516)

Dear Sunanda,

before approving this change to the HLT, I would like to see a short
description of the change, and the usual HLT rate and running studies.

Looking at some of the changes in confused. Did this ever run with the
Stage 2 L1 trigger ?

Ciao,
.Andrea

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/14516#issuecomment-219494215

[fwyzard]

Hi Sourav,
PDF is usually enough, but thanks.

The details in the slides are very scarce - could you elaborate a bit more on what you are trying to achieve, what are the proposed changes, what is the impact on the HLT rates and timing, and its expected evolution with pileup and/or luminosity ?

[Martin-Grunewald]

+1
Remember to file a JIRA ticket for any changes to the HLT python configuration of your paths!

[mmusich]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[fwyzard]

-1

Please provide enough details to understand the impact on the HLT.

[fwyzard]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1