Typo correction in config file

[lathomas]

Similar PR as for 81X: #14538
This is a 1 line correction.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @lathomas for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoMET/METProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @ahinzmann, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13028/console

[slava77]

I think that the earliest this can be added is when we want/need to change to a new 2016 acquisition era (2016C).
@davidlange6 is there going to be an update after/during TS1?

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: d82f2e2
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14539/13028/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
8dc6344
7bce34e
ac08472
0dec346
fe2b488
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14539/13028/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14539/13028/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14539/13028/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

for #14539 d82f2e2

• change muon selection cut to reduce mistag rate; the same code change as in 81X version
• jenkins tests pass and show some changes in CSC halo ID variables

this will be put on hold until there is a good time to integrate in 80X

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[slava77]

hold

until there is a good time to integrate in 80X, since this is a behavior change, but this code is a special case, affecting only data (MC production has a bad/old version)

[cmsbuild]

Pull request has been put on hold by @slava77
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all