Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for runtestTqafTopEventSelection unit test: use againstElectronVLooseMVA6 instead of againstElectronVLooseMVA5 #14596

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 24, 2016
Merged

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

back port from 81X

(cherry picked from commit 7b86dbd)

…ooseMVA6 instead of againstElectronVLooseMVA5

(cherry picked from commit 7b86dbd)
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_8_0_X milestone May 21, 2016
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 21, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13114/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/PatAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @imarches, @ahinzmann, @acaudron, @mmarionncern, @rappoccio, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @ferencek, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 24, 2016

+1

for #14596 1c5d0a9

  • code change is as described; the same change as in 81X. There is no effect on miniAOD because PATTauCleaner is not used there. Analyses should be using MVA6 (if they rerun/redo PAT with cleaning)
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show no differences

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants