Allowing HLT to be seeded by Taus

[Sam-Harper]

Dear All,

The L1EG efficiency is poor at high pt and we need to OR with Tau seeds to recover this. This requires the following change to the seeding module.

My small scale test showed that it was correctly matching with taus, now going for a larger scale test

Cheers,
Sam

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/Egamma

@Martin-Grunewald, @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @fwyzard, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[fwyzard]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13549/console

[fwyzard]

@Sam-Harper, all, I think I have some general comments about this module - irrespective of the urgent addition of tau candidates to the seeds. Who do you think I should bother with them ?

[Sam-Harper]

Yes I agree its a bit nasty. I would talk to Afiq about them.

[fwyzard]

+1
assuming it passes the tests and Sam is happy

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 21a67bd
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14903/13549/summary.html

[fwyzard]

@Sam-Harper , do you also need a similar change in HLTEcalRecHitInAllL1RegionsProducer ?

[Sam-Harper]

Hi Andrea,

I'm happy enough. I get tau matches with this filter. No HLTEcalRecHitInAllL1RegionsProducer is all setup, either Gabi or Afiq had the forsight to do that. I've just proved in fact that module does accept taus .

Cheers,
Sam

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14903/13549/summary.html

[fwyzard]

Hi David, could you build an 8.0.x patch release with this PR ? If it's the same for you, I would prefer an 8.0.10-patch3 , as it would be easier and faster to switch online. If that is problematic, for any reasons, then 8.0.11-patch1 will be fine. Thank you, .Andrea

[davidlange6]

Should be ok with 8_0_10 patch. I'll have a look

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 16, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Andrea Bocci <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Hi David,
could you build an 8.0.x patch release with this PR ?

If it's the same for you, I would prefer an 8.0.10-patch3 , as it would be
easier and faster to switch online.
If that is problematic, for any reasons, then 8.0.11-patch1 will be fine.

Thank you,
.Andrea

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/14903#issuecomment-226531658, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEzyw0txt5SEL948l0uW9EyU_L6rQvBeks5qMXOEgaJpZM4I3Tpp.

[Martin-Grunewald]

@Sam-Harper
Could you please make a PR for 81X as well?
Thanks!

[davidlange6]

+1