Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DQM egm tracking@HLT #15045

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 6, 2016
Merged

DQM egm tracking@HLT #15045

merged 3 commits into from Jul 6, 2016

Conversation

mtosi
Copy link
Contributor

@mtosi mtosi commented Jun 29, 2016

add monitoring of EGM tracking @ HLT
(this is the 1st implementation, it might need some adjustment in the near future)

we need to open a jira ticket in order to add

  1. some paths in the HLTMonitoring stream/PD
  2. some collections in the corresponding output module (and in the output module used by relval for the HLT validation on both data and MC)
    @perrotta @Martin-Grunewald @Anuar @gpasztor @fwyzard @gennai

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/HLTEvF
DQMOffline/Trigger

@cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rociovilar, @HuguesBrun, @trocino, @jhgoh, @battibass this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

PR for 80X?

@mtosi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtosi commented Jun 29, 2016

coming
I need to rebase :(

@mtosi mtosi mentioned this pull request Jun 29, 2016
@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13880/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 5, 2016

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15045/13880/summary.html

The workflows 1003.0, 1001.0, 1000.0 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 9b37ee0 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Jul 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants