Updating SiStrip DQM TriggerBits for HIP monitoring (PR #15447)

[mmusich]

Summary of changes in Global Tags

RunII data

• RunII Offline processing : 81X_dataRun2_v4 as 81X_dataRun2_v3 with the following changes:
  • updated SiStripDQM TriggerBits for HIP monitoring
• RunII Offline relval processing : 81X_dataRun2_relval_v5 as 81X_dataRun2_relval_v4 with the following changes:
  • updated SiStripDQM TriggerBits for HIP monitoring

Updated content

• RunI+ RunII-2015 IOV:

---+++++ *IOV*: 1-264291
| *TriggerBits list key* | *HLT paths* |
| 'SiStrip_HLT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_v*', 'HLT_HIZeroBias_v*', 'HLT_BptxAnd_*' |
| 'SiStrip_L1' | 'L1_ZeroBias' |
| 'Tracking_HLT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_v*', 'HLT_BptxAnd_*' |

• RunII-2016 IOV:

---+++++ *IOV*: 264292-inf
| *TriggerBits list key* | *HLT paths* |
| 'SiStrip_HLT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_v*', 'HLT_HIZeroBias_v*', 'HLT_BptxAnd_*' |
| 'SiStrip_L1' | 'L1Tech_BPTX_plus_AND_minus.v0', 'L1_ZeroBias', 'L1_ExtCond_032' |
| 'Tracking_HLT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_v*', 'HLT_BptxAnd_*' |
| 'Tracking_HLT_HIP_OOT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_FirstBXAfterTrain_v*' |
| 'Tracking_HLT_HIP_noOOT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_FirstCollisionInTrain_v*' |
| 'Tracking_HLT_noHIP_noOOT' | 'HLT_ZeroBias_FirstCollisionAfterAbortGap_v*' |

attn: @mtosi @fioriNTU @arunhep

[mmusich]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/14517/console

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@ghellwig, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @mmusich, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @ghellwig, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 58f9dbe
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15460/14517/summary.html

[mmusich]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15460/14517/summary.html

[davidlange6]

+1

[davidlange6]

seems we either need to change

1. the definition of workflow 1001 to be run2 and make sure this new DQM does not run for the Run1 processing
   or 2) change the GT to include these new keys

any preferences?
@mmusich

[mmusich]

@davidlange6 we can introduce the new keys as well in the run1 run interval, but as far as I can tell will be for technical tests only.
For several other reasons we are working w/ @franzoni to create a new matrix workflow (the run2 version of 1001.0). Depending on the timescale, we can choose either one of the two (the former is faster).

[mmusich]

@davidlange6 I addressed your comment in the cheapest way:
see at #15508