Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

L1TGlobalPrescaler: additional modes based on the prescales in the EventSetup #16260

Merged

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard fwyzard commented Oct 18, 2016

Additional modes based on the prescales in the EventSetup:

  • applyPrescaleValues: apply the given prescale values (original behaviour)
  • applyPrescaleRatios: apply prescales equal to ratio between the given values and the ones read from the EventSetup
  • applyColumnValues: apply the prescale values from the EventSetup corresponding to the given column index
  • applyColumnRatios: apply prescales equal to ratio between the values corresponsing to the given column index, and the ones read from the EventSetup

In the last two cases, also sets the prescale column index to the given one.

…entSetup

  - applyPrescaleValues: apply the given prescale values (original behaviour)
  - applyPrescaleRatios: apply prescales equal to ratio between the given
                         values and the ones read from the EventSetup
  - applyColumnValues:   apply the prescale values from the EventSetup
                         corresponding to the given column index
  - applyColumnRatios:   apply prescales equal to ratio between the values
                         corresponsing to the given column index, and the
                         ones read from the EventSetup

In the last two cases, also sets the prescale column index to the given one.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

L1Trigger/L1TGlobal

@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Oct 18, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 18, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15810/console

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Oct 18, 2016

@rekovic, @mulhearn, can you sign this ?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 055cf0b

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16260/15810/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
4.22 step1

DAS Error
140.53 step1
DAS Error
1000.0 step1
DAS Error
1001.0 step1
DAS Error
1003.0 step1
DAS Error

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Oct 19, 2016

This module is not used in any central workflow.

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Oct 19, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 19, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15819/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16260/15819/summary.html

The workflows 1003.0 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Oct 31, 2016

@rekovic, @mulhearn, can you please comment if there are any issues with this PR, or otherwise sign it ?

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Oct 31, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 898abf2 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Nov 3, 2016
@fwyzard fwyzard deleted the L1TGlobalPrescaler_from_EventSetup branch December 1, 2016 02:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants