Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ME0 re-digitizer module #16354

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Nov 16, 2016
Merged

ME0 re-digitizer module #16354

merged 5 commits into from Nov 16, 2016

Conversation

dildick
Copy link
Contributor

@dildick dildick commented Oct 25, 2016

This module re-digitizes the ME0 pseudo digis. It smears and discretizes the timing position. It is included only in Phase2 digitization sequences.

Note: To be integrated after #16185. I will rebase on top of most recent build after #16185 is integrated.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @dildick (Sven Dildick) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation
Configuration/StandardSequences
DataFormats/GEMDigi
DataFormats/GEMRecHit
DataFormats/MuonDetId
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/GEMGeometry
Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder
Geometry/MuonCommonData
Geometry/MuonNumbering
Geometry/MuonSimData
IOMC/RandomEngine
RecoLocalMuon/GEMSegment
RecoMuon/DetLayers
SimMuon/Configuration
SimMuon/GEMDigitizer
Validation/MuonGEMDigis

@smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @dmitrijus, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @franzoni, @slava77, @vanbesien, @hengne, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @wmtan, @makortel, @abbiendi, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @jhgoh, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @wddgit, @rovere, @ptcox, @battibass, @bellan, @trocino, @dgulhan, @bachtis, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 25, 2016

@dildick @pietverwilligen
should this PR supersede #16185 or should the merge of #16185 be removed from this PR?

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 25, 2016

I merged #16185 to test my code. The merge can be removed. I can also rebase after #16185 is merged.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 25, 2016

-1
the PR looks premature

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16354 was updated. @smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 25, 2016

@slava77 It turns out that my additions do compile without #16185. I removed all #16185 commits.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1
for Core, only added entry to RandomNumberService

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 26, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15980/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16354 was updated. @smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 26, 2016

ME0ReDigiProducer was not registered. I tested WFs 20024.0 and 22424.0 again. Both were successful.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 26, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 26, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15992/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Oct 27, 2016

+1

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Oct 31, 2016

Hi, please let me know if more work is need for this PR. Thanks.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Just adding another random number engine

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@dildick
Copy link
Contributor Author

dildick commented Nov 10, 2016

Can this pull request be integrated, please? Thanks!

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1
though hopefully this module has a very short lifetime.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 0ceca72 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Nov 16, 2016
@dildick dildick deleted the from-CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-10-25-1100-me0-re-digi-module branch July 21, 2017 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants