New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove obsolete customize cust_2023tilted from 2023D6 workflows #16682
Conversation
I believe the cleanup of cust_2023tilted and the integration of D6 interleaved or something.
@cmsbuild, please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @davidlange6, @hengne, @fabozzi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
type bugfix |
-1 Tested at: 2961987 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4/step2_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4.log23234.0 step2 runTheMatrix-results/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D5_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D5+RecoFullGlobal_2023D5+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D5/step2_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D5_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D5+RecoFullGlobal_2023D5+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D5.log |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Failures are already in the IB (not related to this PR). |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Alternative comparison was/were failed for workflow(s): |
@davidlange6 , this should fix the 4 failing relvals for IBs
|
Title says it all (commit picked from #16635).
The customize was removed in #16385, and the D6 workflows were added in #16185. I suspect their integration got somehow interleaved leading to the non-existing customize to stay in the workflow definition.
Tested in CMSSW_9_0_X_2016-11-17-2300, workflows
236xx
run again.@kpedro88 @pietverwilligen