Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2Digitizer package updated #16822

Conversation

suchandradutta
Copy link
Contributor

Updated DigitizerUtility::Amplitude object to store the EncodedEventId properly for individual SimHit contributions to the Digi. There was a subtle bug that only the first EncodedEventId was stored. Another bug has also been fixed where the fraction of individual contribution to the digi was calculated wrongly. A few new histograms are added in the validation suite and a few minor bugs corrected.

Detailed description of the update reported in Tracker Phase2 Simulation meeting can be found here
https://indico.cern.ch/event/536892/contributions/2385404/attachments/1379749/2096939/DigiStudy_Status_Nov29_2016.pdf

@delaere @atricomi @boudoul @emiglior

…d properly for individual SimHit contributions to the Digi. There was a subtle bug that only the first EncodedEventId was stored. Another bug has also been fixed where the fraction of individual contribution to the digi was calculated wrongly. A few new histograms are added in the validation suite and a few minor bugs corrected.
@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar @iahmad-khan - seems this pull request did not get picked up by cmsbuild. can you have a look?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @suchandradutta (Suchandra Dutta) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

SimTracker/SiPhase2Digitizer

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @sdevissc, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @threus, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

ok, seems I just needed to comment on the PR..

@lgray
Copy link
Contributor

lgray commented Dec 2, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16736/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2016

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2016

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Dec 5, 2016

Should there be a 90X version of this PR?

@boudoul
Copy link
Contributor

boudoul commented Dec 5, 2016

Hi @kpedro88 , right, we discussed this today during our tracker meeting, I was thinking that it was part of the one auto forward ported but likely it came after the auto forward port [was lost with my calendar, I thought it was in the 81X queue earlier]
@suchandradutta , could you please make the equivelent for 90X ? likely it is just for 90X actually

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

not needed in 81x. (phase2 dev will evolve in 90x)

@davidlange6 davidlange6 closed this Dec 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants