New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update of the Phase2 Tracker Digitizer Validation suite #17097
Update of the Phase2 Tracker Digitizer Validation suite #17097
Conversation
…gram + trivial updates of title/binning etc for some other exsting histograms
A new Pull Request was created by @suchandradutta (Suchandra Dutta) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: SimTracker/SiPhase2Digitizer @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
please test |
Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
unsigned int rawid = DSViter->id; | ||
DetId detId(rawid); | ||
if (DetId(detId).det() != DetId::Detector::Tracker) continue; | ||
int layer = tTopoHandle_->getITPixelLayerNumber(rawid); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@suchandradutta -please get the product itself instead of the Handle and use it in the loops (as done elsewhere in this class)
Also, could you update the title of this PR to reflect which validation suite is being updated.Thanks
…ad of Handle in loops
Pull request #17097 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
@suchandradutta , improving title of this PR (as David proposed) will not require new test round. |
thanks @suchandradutta for having updated the title - As far as I can see, all comments should have been adressed now |
+1 |
The Phase2 Digitizer validation suite is updated to include OOT Pile up monitoring histogram + trivial updates of title/binning etc for some other exsisting histograms
@boudoul @delaere @atricomi @emiglior