Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sistrip cluster gain/raw cluster charge update - 91X #17865

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Mar 15, 2017

Conversation

yimuchen
Copy link
Contributor

@yimuchen yimuchen commented Mar 9, 2017

  • Using the Digi-ADC value to compute the raw cluster charges
  • Reverted bad line that causes some histogram to be empty: Using correct method trackStudyFromTrajectory() instead of trackStudyFromTrack().

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 9, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @enochnotsocool (Enoch Chen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiStripMonitorTrack

@cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@idebruyn, @threus, @fioriNTU, @hdelanno this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

edm::EDGetTokenT<edmNew::DetSetVector<SiStripCluster> > clusterToken_;
edm::EDGetTokenT<reco::TrackCollection> trackToken_;

edm::Handle<edm::DetSetVector<SiStripDigi>> digiHandle_;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can this become a function-local variable rather than a class member?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Potentially yes.
The reason it is currently implemented as a class member is that since the function where it is actually uses is rather deep in the various methods called by the analyze() method, so initializing it where it is used or passing it though the method calls would require quite a larger alterations to the code.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But that's part of the point...
Since it is a class member it makes it incredibly easy to misuse (ie outside analyze),
the fact you have a very complex call tree makes it even easier.

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 14, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18399/console Started: 2017/03/14 16:32

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #17865 was updated. @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #17865 was updated. @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 14, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18411/console Started: 2017/03/14 19:35

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 43b947b into cms-sw:master Mar 15, 2017
@yimuchen yimuchen deleted the sistrip-gainupdate-91X branch April 13, 2017 08:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants