New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport of ECAL offline selective readout for TSG studies #18016
Backport of ECAL offline selective readout for TSG studies #18016
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @emanueledimarco (Emanuele Di Marco) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducer @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
Pull request #18016 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @fwyzard, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 60cecc1 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/21234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D4_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D4+RecoFullGlobal_2023D4+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D4.log23234.0 step3 runTheMatrix-results/23234.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D8_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D8+RecoFullGlobal_2023D8+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D8/step3_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D8_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull14+DigiFullTrigger_2023D8+RecoFullGlobal_2023D8+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D8.log |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Pull request #18016 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @fwyzard, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Pull request #18016 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @fwyzard, @Martin-Grunewald, @franzoni, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
added the ECAL SRflags digis to the RECO format, as in PR #18141 |
@@ -54,6 +56,8 @@ | |||
#'keep EcalRecHitsSorted_*_*_*', | |||
'keep EcalRecHitsSorted_ecalRecHit_*_*', | |||
'keep EcalRecHitsSorted_ecalPreshowerRecHit_*_*', | |||
'keep EBSrFlagsSorted_ecalDigis__*', | |||
'keep EESrFlagsSorted_ecalDigis__*' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed a comma here; now recovered in the #18141
Please pick it up as well
Pull request #18016 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @silviodonato, @fwyzard, @Martin-Grunewald, @franzoni, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
+1
|
@davidlange6 |
its being checked in pre2 (where it looks like things got requested to ops on Friday) |
Hello @davidlange6 |
@davidlange6 Sorry for the many questions, but since I am one of the main users of this PR, I have a question: is the plan to have an immediate patch release in 90X once this is validated in 91X? Thanks, |
yes - this late development is holding up a number of things..
… On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Rafael Lopes de Sa ***@***.***> wrote:
@davidlange6 Sorry for the many questions, but since I am one of the main users of this PR, I have a question: is the plan to have an immediate patch release in 90X once this is validated in 91X?
Thanks,
-- Rafael.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
This is a backport of the PR #17794 for 90X, needed for TSG studies (@Martin-Grunewald requested)
@bendavid @amassiro @shervin86 @argiro @crovelli @fcouderc @paramatti @gzevi please also follow this