O2O for Ecal Alignment

[depasse]

Automatic switching Bon/Boff with O2O for Ecal Alignment (EB, EE and ES)

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @depasse for master.

It involves the following packages:

CondTools/Ecal

@ggovi, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@apfeiffer1, @argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[ggovi]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/19494/console Started: 2017/05/02 11:39

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 996f4f3
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18466/19494/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-18466/19494/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 3306 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1778721
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 33407
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1745141
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 173
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• Checked 94 log files, 14 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

[ggovi]

@depasse
the implementation looks ok to me, but we should discuss the deployment plan . Can you please provide context and plan at the next AlcaDB meeting, monday May 8.

[depasse]

Hi Giacomo, For the moment, it is just technical, not an Ecal will. The aim is eventually to deploy O2O for EcalPedestals and EcalAlignment (always when switching Bon/Boff, for express and hlt). You will have to use similar commands in EcalTPG.sh as those you used for ADCToGeV or IntercalibConstants. But I'm wondering if the delay introduced by these (4) new commands will not be too long (as they are launched at the beginning of the run). Do you have a measurement of this (maybe a test on ADCToGeV ?) ? I'm waiting for the sentiment of Ecal managers before going further. Thanks. Pierre

…

________________________________ From: ggovi [notifications@github.com] Sent: 02 May 2017 17:06 To: cms-sw/cmssw Cc: Pierre Depasse; Mention Subject: Re: [cms-sw/cmssw] O2O for Ecal Alignment (#18466) @depasse<https://github.com/depasse> the implementation looks ok to me, but we should discuss the deployment plan . Can you please provide context and plan at the next AlcaDB meeting, monday May 8. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#18466 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEaCWy8zsAGL9CgNIiPsmeBM5U-Ugv6yks5r10ZagaJpZM4NHr7I>.

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1