New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
supercluster eta -> seed eta for e/g pixel matching: 91X #18680
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper for CMSSW_9_1_X. It involves the following packages: RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
backport of #18679 |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_2_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
91X flavour of: #18679
This PR changes the eta used for the calo position from the supercluster eta to the seed eta. This is because the supercluster eta is slightly biased w.r.t to the original particles position and so distorts the matching when the electron brems.
This improves our pixel matching performance and is sadly necessary for the HLT. The good news is that it only effects a module used by the HLT so can not effect RECO.
For more information please see Junho Kim's presentation in E/gamma last friday (05/05/17):
https://indico.cern.ch/event/613829/contributions/2581351/attachments/1454808/2244939/5.5.2017_HLTEGv4.pdf
I think with this, the E/gamma HLT pixel matching finally has a good baseline and is sufficient for initial running. Thank you for your patience on this!