Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes needed for llvm 5.0: use fully qualified clangcms::support namespace #20541

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 16, 2017

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

this is needed for llvm 5.0.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for CMSSW_9_4_DEVEL_X.

It involves the following packages:

Utilities/StaticAnalyzers

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test with cms-sw/cmsdist#3412

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 15, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Using externals from cms-sw/cmsdist#3412
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23015/console

@smuzaffar smuzaffar changed the title fixes need for llvm 5.0: use fully qualified clangcms::support fixes needed for llvm 5.0: use fully qualified clangcms::support Sep 15, 2017
@smuzaffar smuzaffar changed the title fixes needed for llvm 5.0: use fully qualified clangcms::support fixes needed for llvm 5.0: use fully qualified clangcms::support namespace Sep 15, 2017
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: a7a1eea

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
f4a63d4
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23015/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23015/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23015/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testNumba had ERRORS
---> test testhep_ml had ERRORS

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
f4a63d4
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23015/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23015/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23015/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 18768 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2646869
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 91430
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2555243
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 189
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 107 log files, 14 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@smuzaffar smuzaffar changed the base branch from CMSSW_9_4_DEVEL_X to master September 16, 2017 06:38
@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_9_4_X milestone Sep 16, 2017
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20541/740

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying a patch in https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20541/740/git-diff.patch
e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20541/740/git-diff.patch | patch -p1

You can run scram build code-checks to apply code checks directly (this will soon be required for PRs to be considered)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20541/741

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #20541 was updated. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones can you please check and sign again.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 16, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23017/console Started: 2017/09/16 08:55

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20541/23017/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2648186
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 206
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2647791
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 189
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 107 log files, 14 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit c295e3b into master Sep 16, 2017
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the llvm5-fix-devel-ibs branch October 6, 2017 05:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants