-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add electrons from HGCAL in the pfCandidate collection #20615
Add electrons from HGCAL in the pfCandidate collection #20615
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @rovere (Marco Rovere) for CMSSW_9_3_X. It involves the following packages: RecoParticleFlow/Configuration @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
assign upgrade |
backport of #20614 |
please test |
New categories assigned: upgrade @kpedro88 you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
merge |
The previously saved collection is created before merging the Barrel and HGCAL-related, sim-driven, components together. The newly saved collection will contain all pfcandidates that should be used to perform physics studies.
This will only affect PhaseII workflows. I expect no regression and very tiny effect on the event size of the final ROOT file.
Also, electrons built within the HGCAL volume were not saved into the particleFlow pfCandidate collection, causing strange effects (artificial MET, missing JETs etc...). Now they are forced into the final collection.
@malgeri, @cseez, @felicepantaleo @kpedro88
Backport of #20614