New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run2-hcx159 Correct bug affecting several special cases for getPosition and getClosestCell #20976
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks |
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master. It involves the following packages: Geometry/CaloTopology @cmsbuild, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
50k single-pion MC test (with current 2017 = "Plan1" HCAL) shows no any difference w/wo this PR - Plot "RecHits hE (GeV) vs ieta R = 0.3 Cone" explicitly involves "getPosition" in question. |
@slava77 - FYI:
|
@bsunanda and @abdoulline - I wonder why nearly half of TrackingParticle tests report failure? |
@ianna I cannot say about TrackingParticles but without these changes the geometry tests for HCAL fails. So please approve this |
+1 Note: reco comparison differences need to be understood |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@ianna - the pixel 2017 comparisons differ due to buggy dqm code (that apparently is already not supported) otherwise, it looks like the differences are only seen in 2019 workflows (eg, after LS2 barrel upgrade) |
+1 |
It affects Plan1 geometry as well as BH geometry for specific ieta values