New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding XeXe, fixed PbPb, and 5 TeV pp (2017) placeholder #21841
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @gsfs for CMSSW_9_4_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/StandardSequences @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
We wanted to make sure people were clear about which version of the beam spot they were using. The older name was already used for a large body of existing MC samples. Having new samples with a shifted beam spot but the same beam spot name did not seem like a good idea. Note that the old name is commented out so that it will not be used by mistake. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+operations |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Backport of PR #21833.
These changes are already in CMSSW_9_3_X being used for XeXe MC